Text Size

Site Search powered by Ajax

Healthcare Blog

RSS Feeds

Richard Rahn - EzineArticles Expert Author
EzineArticles.com is Trusted By Millions as The Source For Quality Original Articles
Richard Rahn - EzineArticles Expert Author
  • Standard Work in the OR
    Standard Work is a core concept in Lean, and so naturally it applies to work done in the OR. The concern is this: modern medicine has become so complex and specialized that Standard Work (including the use of checklists) is critically important. In this short article we examine some of the history of Standard Work, and present the Process Maturity Scale as a tool to assess the level of maturity for OR (or any) processes.
  • Quick Changeover in the OR
    Changeover in the OR refers to a reduction in the time between procedures, or the time required to prepare an operating room for the next patient. Given the high value of this resource, the OR room, any reduction in the changeover time will allow for increased utilization. In the world of manufacturing, the commonly accepted method for changeover reduction is called SMED. This article examines the application of SMED to hospital environments.
  • Managing "A" Inventory Items in the OR
    "A" items (the most expensive supplies) in a surgical department (OR) represent millions of dollars in materials and 70% of the total inventory investment for the hospital. Very few hospitals, however, take steps to maintain current and accurate inventory records for this material.
  • The Par Level Myth Exposed - The Method Nobody Uses (Except Hospitals)
    Would you believe that a dysfunctional supplies management method, called "Par Level", has been adapted as a best practice in a majority of US hospitals? The method is so cumbersome that in its pure form, it can't even be done the way it way designed. It significantly drives up waste associated with counting items, making excessive trips to and from the stockroom, and actually encourages sloppy supplies management practices. The end result: higher healthcare costs, lower staff and patient satisfaction levels, and high investments in supplies and materials.
  • Par Level Vs Kanban Methods - Which One For Hospital Material Management?
    Many hospitals in the US and around the world use a "par level" system for materials and supplies management, to maintain stocking levels of various supplies on hospital floors and stockroom areas. This method is well accepted and considered state of the art. In manufacturing, however, this method is not only not used at all, but it would be considered unworkable and even crazy. The method of choice for commonly used materials in manufacturing is called Kanban.
  • Lean, LEED, and Green
    A recent article by F. Kaid Benfield illustrates how Lean principles apply to a debate now taking place among Green Building practitioners. At issue is the fact that six recent award-winning LEED buildings are located such that they are largely or entirely dependent on automobile travel for access.

Gerard Leone - EzineArticles Expert Author
During Gerard Leone's 20-year career in manufacturing management and consulting, he had the opportunity to work with a broad range of manufacturing enterprises. Originally from Buenos Aires, Argentina, his multilingual skills have been a very valuable tool in spreading the word of Flow Manufacturing around the world. He taught statistics at the University of Buenos Aires and Production Management at Colorado State University, his two Alma Maters. A widely recognized leader in the fields of productivity improvement and manufacturing systems, Gerard has instructed and implemented Flow Processing techniques in the factory and in the office with companies like GN ReSound, ...
Gerard Leone - EzineArticles Expert Author
  • Lean Line Design Knowledge Gap - How to Spot It and How to Solve It
    Kaizen is a very good methodology to spearhead your company's culture of continuous improvement. But Kaizen on a poorly designed line could cause more waste than is intended to eliminate. It all must start with a solid and complete line design. Here are some pointers so you can spot the knowledge gap at your plant.
  • How to Ace Your Joint Commission Survey With Lean
    In December 2010 a mid-size hospital from the East Coast passed their Joint Commission Survey with flying colors. The lead surveyor complemented the hospital leadership on the remarkably few RFIs. This hospital started their Lean journey 14 months before the survey. Even though the hospital leadership does not consider the Lean journey done, they have made great improvements, especially in changing the hospital's culture towards one of relentless pursuit of perfection.
  • The Value Stream Maturity Scale - A Framework for Assessing Progress of Your Lean Healthcare Journey
    After you decide to embark on the Lean journey for you hospital (or department); How do you know you are making progress? You need to have a framework to measure progress in a way that is understandable to all involved. This article addresses the use of the Value Stream Maturity Scale as a way to measure the progress of your Lean Healthcare efforts.
  • Kanban in the Lean OR - How to Get Started
    As a professional implementer of Lean principles in hospitals for the last decade, I continued to be amazed by the fact that hospitals are painfully slow at putting in place simple and effective materials replenishment techniques. The great majority of all hospitals cling stubbornly to the bankrupt "par level" method to handle their supplies.
  • Checklists for the Lean OR
    Healthcare around the world is at a crossroads, evolving from a craftsman-style delivery of care to the creation of an integrated healthcare delivery system. This change is necessary, both to improve patient outcomes and to reduce costs that are growing at an unsustainable rate. The use of checklists will be a powerful tool in this transformation.
  • Is the "Invasive Center" the Future For the Lean OR?
    We are all trying to do more with fewer resources. Hospitals are no exception. That is the idea behind Lean Healthcare, after all. Many hospital executives now demand that all new buildings be designed with Lean principles in mind. One of the trends in hospital design is the Invasive Center concept. This saves floorspace and promises efficiency gains. But a new building, regardless of excellent design is not enough.
  • Instrument Set Flow in the Lean OR
    Achieving fast response in the Sterile Processing Department (SPD) is a challenge that requires a scientific approach. The straight application of rapid improvement events (Kaizen) is bound to take too long for the fast-paced and high-pressure environment of the OR. This article discusses a proven methodology for the overall redesign the SPD so substantial results can be achieved quickly.
  • Staff Engagement in the Lean OR
    One of the most important differences between an organization that is achieving great benefits from their process improvement efforts and an organization with so-so results is the level of employee engagement. In a truly Lean organization, everyone understands that it is not enough to simply do your job well, and that everyone is expected to participate in the improvement work in every process.
  • Finding and Eliminating Waste in the OR
    If you are familiar with the concept of Lean Healthcare, you are familiar with the idea of waste. A Lean Hospital is an organization that is continually improving patient safety and satisfaction, treatment outcomes, and staff development through the elimination of waste, and improvement in patient flow.
  • Prioritizing Instrument Sets in a Lean OR
    There never seem to be enough instrument sets to go around in a traditional OR. This apparent dearth of sets causes many forms of waste from the constant calling (and screaming) to the hunting trips to see where my instruments are. Visual management tools can alleviate these woes with simple, low-tech, yet powerful solutions from the Lean toolbox.

 

Eliminating Waste in the OR

If you are familiar with the concept of Lean Healthcare, you are familiar with the idea of waste. A Lean Hospital is an organization that is continually improving patient safety and satisfaction, treatment outcomes, and staff development through the elimination of waste, and improvement in patient flow.

Lean always goes hand-in-hand with the term waste. In this chapter we’ll discuss the different forms of waste and some examples we would find in the OR and its associated services.

Overproduction. This form of waste takes place when we produce more than what is needed right now by the customer.

Examples of this waste in the Perioperative Services department are:

  • Reassembling instrument sets in large batches while the autoclave sits idle. The symptom is “We do not have enough instrument sets.”
  • Spiking IV bags in Pre-Surgery for the whole day, while patients wait. The symptom is “Our on-time starts are very low.”

You may think that over-producing is OK because you will need it eventually. Eventually is not now. Now is what matters, and now is when the patient is waiting. The time you missed you never get back, so do not over-produce.

Message to Charge Nurses and Clinical Managers: Do not make staff over-produce to keep them busy during a slow time. Have them do continuous improvement and you will get a great payback.

Transportation. We see this form of waste when the product or the patient (the value to be delivered) is moved without adding value.

Examples of this form of waste are:

  • Blood specimens collected at the oncology unit go on a hospital tour before reaching the lab.
  • IV and DVT pumps go from the patient room to Sterile Processing and back via utility rooms, for a few seconds of cleaning.

This waste is a bit more complex than saying “just stop doing that”, as it was the case with over-production. This waste requires you to ask why in a more forceful way, and to come up with practical alternatives.

Motion. This form of waste refers to staff members moving without adding value. This becomes evident in the amount of walking staff members do during their day. They are normally looking or “hunting” for something. Why is it that we cannot provide clinicians with the tools and supplies they need to take care of patients?

Some examples of motion waste are:

  • Searching for a patient lift, a positioning device, an IV pump or any piece of equipment. The level of frustration staff members feel when they cannot find what they need is enormous. Delay of care can also be dangerous for the patient.
  • Searching for paperwork. If your hospital still requires hand-written paperwork for surgical patients, you may find yourself scrambling for that document while the patient is on the table.

This is one of the easiest forms of waste to solve. The application of 7S methods and the abolishment of the Par Level system for supplies management would get you 75% of the way.

Waiting. This is idle time created when supplies, information, people, or equipment is not ready.

If you find yourself waiting on any kind of service you need to start asking why, and be ready to take action once you get the answer. Just one rule: blaming somebody else is not allowed.

Take a stroll through the waiting rooms. How many patients do you see waiting? Go to pre-surgery. How many patients are ready, but their OR is not? Go to PACU. How many patients are recovered, but there is no room for them to be moved to?

Over-processing. These are work steps that do not add value to the patient or customer.

This is the waste of overdoing. It is so easy to believe you are doing the right thing by overdoing. Think about the times you do this at home: “If three screws will do, five must be better”.

In one Perioperative Services Department, staff was checking case carts four times, due to the unspoken distrust of the prior processes.

Excess Inventory. When you see more supplies, equipment or paperwork than what the customer needs right now, you have excess inventory. The OR is the champion of excess inventory in the hospital. The OR wants to have enough inventory in case the worst happens, and then double that in case the Martians attack.

Excess inventory gives staff a false sense of security. When you need something, you then have to wade through piles of stuff to get to what you need. Are you seeing the waste yet?

To that, add the increased risk of expired items due to the piles you have to go through. Pick a couple of well-stocked shelves and see if you find any expired supplies.

The main culprit is the incredible anachronistic Par Level system that many ORs use for supplies management. It is mind boggling that hospitals still use such an inefficient method to deliver supplies to clinicians. Start by abolishing Par.

The result of implementing Lean supplies management will be a substantial reduction in inventory dollars coupled with the elimination of shortages.

Defects. Defects represent work that contains errors, requires rework, has mistakes or lacks something necessary.

Nothing proclaims a broken process quite like defective work. The temptation is to start with the old search for accountability, and looking for someone to blame. Instead, try looking at the broken process and asking why, or use simple assessment tools like a fishbone diagram. Engage other staff members in finding solutions. The results will amaze you.

A typical OR example is that of an incomplete instrument set. Your choices are: “Accountability!” or, after you solve the immediate need ask: “Why was the set incomplete?”

  • Could it be that it was sent to SPD from the OR incomplete?
  • Could it be that we need to develop work instructions for each instrument set?
  • Could it be that the instrument was sent to sharpening?

And the list goes on. What are you going to do once you get the answers?

Ineffective Use of Computers. This form of waste refers to time spent at the computer, not using the available software efficiently.

No one would question the fact that the use of computers is a must in the modern hospital. However, when their use detracts from patient care, we must stop and ask why.

Take another stroll and go to pre-surgery. Stand in the department and count the number of clinicians in patient rooms versus the number in front of a computer screen. What is the ratio? What should that ratio be?

Human Potential. The waste of human potential is not taking advantage of people’s natural desire to be a part of something good.

This is the worst form of waste, because by engaging staff you will identify and reduce or eliminate all the other forms of waste. This is not about the touchy-feely stuff like “Our staff is our most valuable asset” or “we practice respect for our people”.

Show respect for staff by engaging them in the solutions to the problems that afflict their processes. Check the results. You will be amazed.

Now is your turn. What forms of waste do you see in your OR? What is your plan to identify and eliminate it?

 

Managing "A" Items in the OR

Imagine this: You walk into a local bank to open an account. As you're speaking to a bank representative, you notice that there are no tellers. Instead, customers seem to be walking into the unguarded vault and helping themselves, either depositing or taking the cash. The bank rep explains: "We can't really afford to hire people to just keep track of the cash, so we operate with the honor system. When you take some cash or drop some off, you are supposed to leave us a note. Once a month we'll do a count and reconcile the balances. Most people are pretty good at following the system, but we always have some variances to write up or down. But paying tellers to just keep track of the cash is a waste we just can't afford." By this time you're running for the door.

As ridiculous as this seems, this is exactly the way that many (most) hospital OR's handle their supplies and materials. Much of the material in the OR falls under the inventory classification of A items, items with a high dollar value. Examples of A items include implants, stents, and grafts. The dollar value of this material in the OR can easily total several million dollars or more, and represent 70% of your total inventory investment.

How do we keep track of all of these dollars, in the form of supplies? Very few OR departments actually maintain a perpetual inventory system, that keeps track of material like a bank keeps track of cash. In other words, at any given point in time the OR doesn't really know what is in stock without physically looking. Complete physical inventories are done periodically, sometimes as infrequently as every six months, and there are significant accounting write-ups or write-downs whenever this is done. Needless to say, this is a source of heartburn for the hospital financial department as well.

So why is this apparently common state of affairs, something that would be unacceptable in a bank or even a manufacturing company, allowed to continue in hospitals? Here are some of the reasons we hear:

1. Our focus is on the patient. We can't expect nurses and doctors to become "bean-counters". They're too busy.
2. Supplies and materials are often needed urgently. We can't slow down to fill out paperwork or transact what we need, because it's too time consuming.
3. We can't afford to hire any new FTEs to track materials, because that's just another overhead expense, and we need to control costs.
4. That's not the way things are done in a hospital.

Before we offer some suggestions for improvement, let's take a look at the hard costs related to lax inventory management. In that way we can make a more informed decision about what we can afford, or what level of attention to supplies might be needed. Here are some of the symptoms:

1. Shortages. If we don't know with precision what we have, then an inevitable results will be a higher level of shortages. The results can be serious for our patients, and also drive high expediting and overnight freight costs.
2. Inaccuracies in billing. Not everything gets billed out correctly if we don't have tight reins on inventory management.
3. Excessive supplies handling. The "par level" method used to assess inventory needs is horribly inefficient. It should be replaced with the system used by most world-class organizations, kanban. See my ezinearticle on Par and Kanban.
4. Inaccurate financial statements. The accounting rules tell us that if we don't really know what we have, we also don't really know what our costs are for any given financial reporting period.
5. Excess inventory. If inventory records are not accurate, we tend to compensate by overstocking. In a recent improvement project, we removed over $500,000 in excess inventory from an OR, without breathing hard.

What should you do about managing A items? There are several possibilities, ranging from the very manual to the high tech. The simplest suggestion is to do what most high performing organizations do: have a quick-response stockroom in the OR, with individuals assigned to inventory control, inventory transactions and patient service for materials. Set a goal of being able to put your hands on any item within 10 seconds, and set up the storage area to be able to accomplish this. Plan to staff the area for hours that match the schedule of OR need.

An intermediate-level solution would involve the use of bar-codes to speed up transactions and reduce errors. Nurses and techs can be trained to use the bar-code system, and reduce the workload on the materials staff. Barcoding is not a new technology, and virtually every inventory system supports it.

On the high-tech side, install RFID-based cabinets. An RFID cabinet is a locked storage container that is able to track what is inside via a Radio Frequency Identification tag attached to each high-dollar item. In order to unlock the cabinet an employee badge and a patient case number are needed. The RFID cabinet has the advantage of being able to capture billing information in addition to inventory information, and greatly reducing human error.

Regardless of the path you choose to follow, it is important to make a commitment to a high level of inventory control for A items in the OR. This effort will pay for itself many times over.

   

Lean, LEED and Green

David K. Coombs, Senior Lean Consultant
Leonardo Group Americas
February 23, 2010

A recent article by F. Kaid Benfield illustrates how Lean principles apply to a debate now taking place among Green Building practitioners.  At issue is the fact that six recent award-winning LEED buildings are located such that they are largely or entirely dependent on automobile travel for access.

Benfield, Director of the Smart Growth Program for the Natural Resources Defense Council, argues that the Green standards developed and promulgated by LEED should place much more weight on the location of buildings in relation to communities, customers, employees, and non-automotive transit facilities.  How can a building – even one boasting solar panels, great insulation, and optimized energy systems – claim to be truly Green if everyone using that building commutes there alone in a car? 

It is a striking fact that for most modern, energy-efficient buildings, the annual energy in BTUs (primarily gasoline) consumed by occupants traveling to work is much greater than the total BTUs required (typically electricity and gas) to heat, cool, and operate the building!  A fine building featuring the latest Green expertise and energy technology may cause decades of transportation waste if built in the wrong place.

How does this relate to the Lean principles we apply in the manufacturing world?  Quite directly, actually.  Benfield chides the Green Building Council (which administers the LEED standards) for “emphasizing bells and whistles – building technology” in its Green evaluations.  In Lean terms, he’s talking about the error of “single point optimization” – focusing on one process in a Value Stream while ignoring the linking and balancing that are so crucial to delivering customer value.  Overinvestment in one production process will only cause more waste, such as work-in-process inventory, ahead of and after it.  It is even more wasteful to arrange processes so far apart that time, distance and unnecessary transportation overwhelm any productive gains made at the place of work.

In the language of his own profession, Benfield makes a great Lean argument:  don’t get so wrapped up in optimizing the productivity, capacity, or “Greenness” of a process – in this case, a Green commercial building – that you lose all those benefits, and more, in waste generated by poor linking and balancing with upstream and downstream processes.  For a textbook example of this blunder, recall General Motors’ adventure with robotics in the 1980s.  It’s not about the monuments, however sophisticated, expensive, or Green they might be.  What really counts in both Lean and Green is the creation of optimal value with minimal waste – across the entire Value Stream.


References:

“LEED Awards Show Why Green Criteria Need Reform”, F. Kaid Benfield, Natural Resources Defense Council, January 11, 2010.
http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/kbenfield/leed_awards_show_why_green_cri.html

“Driving to Green Buildings:  The Transportation Energy Intensity of Buildings”, Alex Wilson and Rachel Navaro, BuildingGreen.com, September 1, 2007.
http://www.buildinggreen.com/auth/article.cfm?fileName=160901a.xml

 

Par Level vs Kanban Methods: Which One for Hospital Material Management?

Richard Rahn, Principal
Leonardo Group Americas

Kanban Method

We think we've uncovered an opportunity that could mean millions of dollars in savings to individual hospitals, and billions of dollars to the healthcare system nationally. It has to do with how most hospitals manage supplies, medications and other materials.

Many, maybe most, hospitals manage their inventory of supplies and medications using what’s called a “par-level” method. It works like this: a stocking quantity is established for each item, the par level, based on average usage and a target number of days supply. We might, for example, set a goal of maintaining a two-day quantity of material for each supply item. As the material is actually used, we would bring the quantities “up to par” daily, by conducting a physical inventory and restocking the quantity that was consumed. The goal, sensibly, is to not run out of supplies while maintaining a tight control of storage space and inventory quantities. So far so good.

It is interesting to note that this par method of inventory control is rarely used in a world-class manufacturing environment, although a manufacturer certainly has the same needs and goals for inventory control as a hospital. The suggestion that we do a daily physical inventory would be greeted with astonishment and disbelief. Many world-class manufacturing companies don’t even conduct an annual inventory, having sustained a high level of inventory accuracy through tight controls and cycle counting. The method of choice in manufacturing for “C” items is called Kanban. In a Kanban system, as with the par level method, we set a target quantity that we want to maintain. The principal difference is that instead of attempting to bring quantities “up to par” daily, in a Kanban system we set a fixed quantity that we will use to trigger the replenishment of inventory. In a “two-bin” kanban system, for example, we set up two quantities or bins of the same supply, and only refill a bin when it is empty. While the bin is being refilled, we have a second bin to cover usage during the replenishment cycle.

The Kanban method has seven main advantages over a Par-level system:
1.    No daily counting is needed. We wait for a bin to be emptied and always replenish the same quantity. Not having to count can save hundreds or thousands of hours per year in most hospitals.
2.    Reduces the number of resupply trips. Since we do not refill a Kanban bin daily, but instead wait for it to be empty, the number of replenishment trips can be reduced significantly. The number of replenishment cycles can be cut by 50% or more.
3.    Replenishment quantities are fixed.  The refilling process is greatly simplified by eliminating the need for counting required by the par system. If we know ahead of time what the refill quantity will be, the item can be stocked in that quantity.
4.    Easier to manage and improve. By tracking the time between replenishments, the stocking quantities can more easily be refined and adjusted over time. This continuous improvement is more difficult to accomplish if all quantities are refilled daily, in varying quantities.
5.    Kanban reduces inventory.  Experience proves that, with the same target coverage of supplies, a Kanban system will run with up to 50% less inventory than a par system.
6.    Easier to maintain replenishment discipline. Since they do not have to count all inventory locations, or eye-ball the empty bins, Supplies handlers find it easier to identify and refill the empty bins, thereby substantially reducing the opportunities for shortages.
7.    Kanban promotes good inventory management practices, while the par level does not. In fact, counting everything is essentially impossible and very labor intensive, and most par-level users simply “eye-ball” the bins without counting. Organization and housekeeping, “5S” in lean terms, is much easier to maintain.

For all of these reasons, Kanban is the method of choice for hospital material management, for much of the material that is procured and managed. The gains in productivity, reduced shortages and reduced inventory represent a multi-billion dollar opportunity for the industry.